Skip to main content

Yeah, I guess a lot of this is Self-Help.





Calvin & Hobbes is just funny; I think Bill Watterson, the mysterious author who created it, is a comedian—an artist not devoted to any viewpoint but devoted, ultimately, to comedy. He uses his character, Calvin, to find what is funny. He occasionally also finds what is poignant and moving and profound, but he constantly returns to funny—it is like the True North that he re-orients himself to.

I say this not having recently done any deep reading of Calvin & Hobbes; I’ve just been following some of these accounts that re-print old C&H comics. But as I do so, and as he makes me laugh, I find myself wondering what is behind the jokes—what is the viewpoint of this joke, or that joke? Is it liberal or conservative? Is there a general theme? But overall, I don’t see one.

And I find this somewhat surprising; I hold him in such high regard that I guess I assumed that he had to be something more than funny. When I thought of his comic I didn’t think just “comedy” … I thought of its other attributes. But I think that is just what happens when an artist stays true to his art—the audience starts to trust that comic. His integrity allows him to accomplish much more than what he originally intended.

So with that great compliment—to Calvin & Hobbes in particular and great comedians and artists in general—I can now address the above strip in general and what it has to do with my own interests. I find myself, of late, posting videos about books that could be described as self-help books. M. Scott Peck, David R. Hawkins and up next, Eckhart Tolle—they all write books with the rather grandiose aims of helping you live your life.

And yet, for all that, their authors seem humble and wise and … I don’t find any of them particularly grandiose in their style. Did I fall in to a trap reading self-help writers—am I, as Calvin jokes, addicted to self-help books? I don’t think so; I’m not really looking for new ones to read at the moment. And really, why wouldn’t any or all of us be interested in books about how to live one’s life. You start out living life on your own, but eventually, it’s probably good to seek help.

In schools, we just read fiction, because I guess no teacher or school wants to have to answer for having told its students how they should live. But teachers and schools ultimately do tell their students how they should live. Seems like they ought to be able to avail themselves of the work of published writers, men and women who have thought long and hard on the subject.

In any case, I have a series of videos on my Facebook page about the book The Road Less Traveled, published I think in 1979 by M. Scott Peck. I have several other videos about the book Letting Go, by David R. Hawkins, published more recently in 2012. Both are I think great books; I hope that in my own work you get some distilled version of the wisdom of these writers, and feel free to interact with me as we all consider the difficult subject of how to live. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Baseball Should Come Back & Basketball Shouldn't

So I previously stated this elsewhere and more forcefully--the whole "basketball is coming back" story kind of sucks and we'd all be better off if it weren't the case. On the other hand, "baseball is coming back" is a sensible story that hopefully will happen, although it might not. Let's review the differences. Basketball season goes from November to June. If not for Covid-19, they'd be finishing the Conference Finals this week, getting us set for the final, best-of-seven, championship series to be played next week. However, most everyone agrees that whomever returns to play needs a week-plus of training to get back into shape. So while the Finals normally end by June 15, this rescheduled end-of-basketball-season wouldn't start until July or August, which is usually the offseason. Meanwhile, baseball usually runs from April till late October. Thus, though we've missed the first half of the baseball season, it can start in July and it will be

The Art of Being A Pundit

I'm glad I have my own show, because the tension between these hosts who work together is normally not good. I guess that I think Kornheiser and Wilbon do it as well as anybody--and I don't think they do that good. Here I have to remind myself that I'm talking about living people and not like ... historical or fictional characters. And that's because Kornheiser and Wilbon are victims of their own success. I'm saying, I guess, that Kornheiser and Wilbon are a little bit like The Simpsons . They were great for several years--let's round up and say they were good for a decade. They had personality, edge, charisma--the necessary components to being good. But to stay on the air for longer than a decade, a sports personality has to make compromises. The edge just can't be real for longer than a decade. (Maybe the same is true for an animated sitcom but I'm not sure--the analogy was more the number of years one can be good for.) The "chemistry" on PTI